Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.9 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2019-09-24 | 2014-09-29 |
| 6.08 x 2.85 x 0.41 inches | 6.04 x 3.09 x 0.33 inches |
| 8.50 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black | Black, Gold, Pink and White |
| Titanium | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.9 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2250 x 2088 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 389 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 20 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-T760 MP6 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.56 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3220mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha is much better than Samsung Galaxy Note4, with a overall score of 88.9 against 77.6. Even though the Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha is noticeably newer than Samsung Galaxy Note4, it is somewhat thicker and noticeably heavier. The Galaxy Note4 features a little sharper display than Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha, because although it has a way smaller screen and a little bit worse 1440 x 2560 resolution, it also counts with a better screen pixel density.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha features a way bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy Note4, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha has a little bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy Note4, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha also has 9 GB more RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha features superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note4, because it has a 4050mAh battery size instead of 3220mAh. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha captures just a bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note4, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same video resolution, the Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha also has a much larger camera aperture to capture better low light photos, a camera with way more mega pixels and a much bigger back camera sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.