Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.9 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-09-24 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.08 x 2.85 x 0.41 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 8.50 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| Titanium | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.9 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2250 x 2088 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 389 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.56 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is slightly better than Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha, with a 90.8 score against 88.9. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has a newer 11 version while Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha has Android 10, providing the user lots of additional features and performance enhancements. The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE construction is newer, notably lighter and thinner than the Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha counts with a little bit better performance than Galaxy S20 FE, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha also has a higher amount of RAM. Galaxy S20 FE features a display that is very similar to Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha's screen, because although the Galaxy S20 FE has a little smaller screen and a way lower 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a little bit greater pixels number per inch in the screen.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha has a quite bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE counts with a camera that is just as good as the camera in Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha, although the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low light captures, a way smaller sensor capturing lot worse quality photographs, a way less megapixels camera and a worse video quality.
The Galaxy S20 FE features a bit superior battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.