Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.9 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-09-24 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.08 x 2.85 x 0.41 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 8.50 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Black | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Titanium | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.9 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2250 x 2088 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 389 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.56 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is better than the Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha, getting a 98 score against 88.9. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has newer 13 version while Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha has Android 10 version, giving you some nice extra features and better performance. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a a bit lighter and somewhat thinner cellphone than Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha, even though both of them were only released 5 months apart.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha features a bit better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G. They have the same RAM amount and a Octa-Core CPU. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features just a bit better display than Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha, because although it has a quite lower 1440 x 3200 resolution and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixels density.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha has a bigger storage for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 384 GB more internal storage. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G captures a lot better photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha, because although it has a way tinier sensor capturing much lower quality videos and images and a tinier aperture which is not good for low-light photography and videos, and they both have a back camera with a 108 megapixels resolution, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also counts with a much better video quality.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has improved battery performance than Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4050mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.