Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.9 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2019-09-24 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.08 x 2.85 x 0.41 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 8.50 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Black | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Titanium | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.9 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2250 x 2088 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 389 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.56 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has an overall score of 95.4, which is slightly better than Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha's score of 88.9. The Galaxy S22 Ultra is a way newer phone, and it's also a bit lighter and somewhat thinner than the Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha. Both phones in our current comparison use Android operating system, but Galaxy S22 Ultra has the newer 13 version while Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha has Android 10 version.
Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a much sharper screen than Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha, because although it has a little worse resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels and a little smaller display, it also counts with a better pixel density. Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha counts with much more memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has more internal storage capacity.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha has a little faster processor than Galaxy S22 Ultra, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Galaxy S22 Ultra features better battery duration than Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a very superior camera than Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low light captures and videos, and they both have a back facing camera with a 108 MP resolution and the same sensor size, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also counts with a way higher 7680x4320 video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.