Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.9 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2019-09-24 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.08 x 2.85 x 0.41 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 8.50 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Black | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Titanium | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.9 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2250 x 2088 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 389 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.56 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha has a global score of 88.9, which is much better than the Galaxy S7's 79.5 overall score. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha design is newer than the Galaxy S7's, although it is much thicker and incredibly heavier. The Galaxy S7 counts with a better looking display than Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a much smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch of screen.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha features a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has more CPU cores and more RAM. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha captures a little bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy S7, and although they both have the same video frame rates, a F1.7 diafragm aperture and the same (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha also has a way larger sensor capturing lot better quality videos and photos and a much more mega pixels camera.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha features a much greater memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S7, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha counts with a much better battery duration than Galaxy S7, because it has a 4050mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.