Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.9 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-09-24 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.08 x 2.85 x 0.41 inches | 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches |
| 8.50 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Black | Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Titanium | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 336.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.9 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2250 x 2088 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 389 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.56 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha is better than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, with an 88.9 score against 78.1. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha has 10 version while Samsung Galaxy S7 edge has Android 8.0 Oreo. Even though Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha is incredibly newer than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, it is extremely heavier and a lot thicker.
The Galaxy S7 edge has a bit sharper screen than Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha, because although it has a way smaller display and a little lower 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution, it also counts with more pixels per display inch. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha features a bit better processor than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has 8 GB more RAM and a larger number of cores.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha shoots slightly better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, and although they both have a F1.7 camera aperture, the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha also has a camera in the back with a lot higher resolution and a lot larger camera sensor capturing lot higher quality videos and photographs.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha counts with a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha counts with just a little better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity against 3600mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.