Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.9 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-09-24 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.08 x 2.85 x 0.41 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 8.50 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Titanium | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2250 x 2088 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 389 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.56 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, getting an 88.9 score against 88.5. These devices use Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha has the previous 10 version and Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has Android 12. Even being the best we compare here, it must be noted that it is also a notably thicker and noticeably heavier device.
Galaxy Z Flip has just a bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha, because although it has a way worse resolution of 1080 x 2636px and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little greater display pixel density. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha counts with a bit better performance than Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha also has more RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha has a superior memory for applications and games than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has more internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha captures a bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same video quality, the Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha also has a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low light captures, a back camera with much more mega pixels and a way bigger back camera sensor.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha counts with improved battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 4050mAh battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.