Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.9 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-09-24 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.08 x 2.85 x 0.41 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 8.50 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Black | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Titanium | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.9 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2250 x 2088 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 389 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.56 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a bit better than Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha, having a 94.6 score against 88.9. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a newer and way thinner device than the Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha, although it's also somewhat heavier. Both devices we are comparing work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a newer 11 version while Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha has Android 10 version, so it gives some extra features.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha features a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has a little bit greater pixel density, a quite larger screen and a slightly higher resolution of 2088 x 2250 pixels. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha and the Galaxy Z Fold 2 both count with very similar processors, they have a 12 GB RAM and 8 CPU cores.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha counts with much more memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has more internal storage. Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha counts with a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha also has a way larger sensor providing a lot better image quality, a larger diafragm aperture for better images and videos in low light environments and a camera in the back with a lot higher 108 megapixels resolution.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with just a little better battery life than Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha, because it has an 11% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.