Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.9 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2019-09-24 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.08 x 2.85 x 0.41 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 8.50 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Titanium | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2250 x 2088 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 389 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.56 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha has an overall score of 88.9, which is a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's 81.1 general score. Both of these phones come with the same Android 10 OS. Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha is a somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker cellphone than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro. Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha has a bit more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a bit worse quantity of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a larger display and a better resolution of 2088 x 2250px.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha features a little bit better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha has a much greater storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 448 GB more internal memory.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a better camera than Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha, although it has a lower video resolution, a camera with way less MP resolution, a smaller aperture and a way smaller back camera sensor. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features superior battery performance than Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.