Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.3 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-07-19 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.28 x 5.64 x 0.18 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.97 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2488 x 2224 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 417 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 6.21 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone X is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, getting a general score of 88.1 against 84.3. The iPhone X construction is much lighter than the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, but it is much thicker and was released 7 years before. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 counts with a sharper display than Apple iPhone X, because although it has a little lower number of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with much more brightness, a way bigger display and a way better 2224 x 2488 pixels resolution.
The iPhone X has a much powerful processor than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, because although it has lesser RAM memory and 2 lesser cores (although they are faster), it also counts with a 64-bit processor. The Apple iPhone X has as much memory capacity for games and applications as the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 one, both have the same 256 GB internal memory.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 shoots much clearer photos and videos than Apple iPhone X, because it has a way higher 7680x4320 video quality, a way bigger camera sensor providing a lot better image quality, a larger aperture and a lot more mega pixels camera. Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has a way better battery life than iPhone X, because it has a 5100mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.