Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.3 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-07-19 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.28 x 5.64 x 0.18 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.97 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Black, Purple and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2488 x 2224 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 417 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.88 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 is a little bit better than the Google Pixel 3a, getting an 84.3 score against 78.8. Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4's body is noticeably newer and a lot thinner than Google Pixel 3a's, but it's also extremely heavier. These phones have Android OS, but the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has a newer 14 version and Google Pixel 3a has Android 11.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 counts with a much more vibrant display than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a quite worse screen density, it also counts with a much better resolution of 2224 x 2488 pixels and a lot larger screen. Google Pixel 3a counts with a much better performing processing unit than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 features a much bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 counts with a really longer battery performance than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 5100mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has a much better camera than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a larger aperture to capture better captures and video in low-light situations, a way more megapixels back facing camera, a much higher video resolution and a lot larger camera sensor shooting way higher quality videos and photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.