Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.3 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-07-19 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.28 x 5.64 x 0.18 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.97 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Black, Purple and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2488 x 2224 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 417 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.88 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 is slightly better than the Google Pixel 3a XL, with an 84.3 score against 78.9. Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4's body is extremely newer and thinner than Google Pixel 3a XL's, but it's extremely heavier. Both phones in this comparison review use Android OS, but the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has a more recent 14 version and Google Pixel 3a XL has Android 11 version, so it offers a couple additional features and better performance.
The Google Pixel 3a XL features an extremely better CPU than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, although it has 8 GB less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 counts with a lot better screen than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a lot larger screen, a just a little greater pixel density and a lot better 2224 x 2488 resolution.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 features a very superior storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has more internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 features a much better battery life than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a 5100mAh battery capacity. Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 features a lot better camera than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a much more mega pixels camera in the back, a lot larger camera sensor shooting lot better quality videos and pictures, a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low-light captures and a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.