Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.3 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-07-19 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.28 x 5.64 x 0.18 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.97 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2488 x 2224 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 417 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 is a bit better than Google Pixel 4, getting a score of 84.3 against 81.9. Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4's design is incredibly newer and a lot thinner than Google Pixel 4's, although it's also noticeably heavier. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has a more vivid screen than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a just a little worse pixel number per inch of screen, it also counts with a way better resolution of 2224 x 2488px and a much bigger display.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 features a superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 4, because it has more internal memory. Google Pixel 4 has a really superior hardware performance than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 shoots much better photos and videos than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have the same aperture, the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 also has a way larger back camera sensor which provides a way better image and video quality, a lot better video resolution and a lot more mega-pixels camera in the back.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has a really longer battery duration than Google Pixel 4, because it has 5100mAh of battery capacity against 2800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.