Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.3 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-07-19 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.28 x 5.64 x 0.18 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.97 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2488 x 2224 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 417 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has an overall score of 84.3, which is a bit better than the Google Pixel 4 XL's score of 82.9. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 design is a lot newer and notably thinner, but also heavier than Google Pixel 4 XL. Google Pixel 4 XL features a way better hardware performance than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has a better looking display than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a bit lower quantity of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 2224 x 2488 pixels and a bigger screen. Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 captures much better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have the same aperture, the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 also has a much larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a much higher video quality and a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has a much bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 192 GB more internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 counts with a really longer battery performance than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has a 38% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.