Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.3 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-07-19 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.28 x 5.64 x 0.18 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.97 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Just black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2488 x 2224 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 417 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.88 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has a general score of 84.3, which is a little bit better than Google Pixel 4a's general score of 82.9. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has the newer 14 version while Google Pixel 4a has Android 11 version. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 construction is incredibly newer and much thinner than Google Pixel 4a's, although it is notably heavier.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 counts with a way better screen than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a quite lower display pixels density, it also counts with a way higher resolution of 2224 x 2488px and a really bigger screen. Google Pixel 4a counts with a very superior hardware performance than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 cores.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 counts with a very superior storage for applications and games than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 128 GB more internal storage. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 shoots greater photographs and videos than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have a F1.7 diafragm aperture, the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 also has a much higher 50 megapixels resolution camera in the back, a much larger back-facing camera sensor providing a way better image quality and a way better video resolution.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 features a very superior battery life than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 62% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.