Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.3 | 92.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 14 | Android 14 |
| 2024-07-19 | 2024-03-22 |
| 6.28 x 5.64 x 0.18 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.97 ounces | 8.36 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Agate Grey and Frozen Berry |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Titanium |
| -- | $ 1389.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2488 x 2224 pixels | 2800 x 1280 pixels |
| AMOLED | LTPO |
| 417 pixels per inch | 453 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | 5000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10 | 10.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset |
| processor | 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 24 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 6.21 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 1 TB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 23.2 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.54 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Battery | 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 7.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
Comparison review
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a score of 92.1, which is a little bit better than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4's general score of 84.3. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design is a better phone than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, we must note that it is also notably thicker and a little heavier. These phones have the same Android 14 operating system.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with a way better hardware performance than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design also has more RAM. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with a bit more vivid display than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, because although it has a bit smaller screen and a way lower resolution of 1280 x 2800 pixels, it also counts with a quite greater pixel number in each screen inch and way more brightness.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 captures slightly better photographs and videos than Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have a 50 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera and the same camera sensor size, the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 also counts with a much higher video resolution.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with a much better memory for apps and games than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, because it has more internal storage. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design features just a bit longer battery duration than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, because it has a 5600mAh battery size against 5100mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.