Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.3 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | HTC |
| Android 14 | Android 5.0 |
| 2024-07-19 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.28 x 5.64 x 0.18 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.97 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 5 inches |
| 2488 x 2224 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 417 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 10 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.54 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 6.88 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 is a bit better than HTC One M9, with an 84.3 score against 77.7. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has the newer 14 version and HTC One M9 has Android 5.0 version, so it provides you a lot of extra features. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 body is newer and thinner than HTC One M9's, but it is also notably heavier.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has a little more vivid screen than HTC One M9, because although it has a little less pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a really bigger screen and a way better resolution of 2224 x 2488px. HTC One M9 features an extremely better processing unit than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, and they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the HTC One M9 also counts with an additional graphics co-processor and a 64 bits processing unit.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has a superior memory for apps and games than HTC One M9, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 features a lot better camera than HTC One M9, because it has a lot better video quality, a back facing camera with a lot higher resolution, a much bigger back-facing camera sensor which provides a much better photo and video quality and a lot bigger aperture for better photos in low light situations.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 counts with a superior battery lifetime than HTC One M9, because it has 5100mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.