Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.3 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | HTC |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-07-19 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.28 x 5.64 x 0.18 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.97 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2488 x 2224 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 417 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.88 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 is a little bit better than the HTC U Ultra, with a general score of 84.3 against 77. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 is a incredibly newer and way thinner phone than the HTC U Ultra, although it is noticeably heavier. Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 counts with a much better display than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a just a bit less pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a lot larger screen and a better 2224 x 2488 resolution.
The HTC U Ultra counts with a bigger storage to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The HTC U Ultra counts with a much more powerful processor than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and a lower number of cores (although faster).
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 counts with a way better battery performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 5100mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 counts with a very superior camera than HTC U Ultra, because it has a larger camera aperture, a back facing camera with a much better resolution, a way better 7680x4320 video resolution and a way larger sensor which provides a lot higher image and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.