Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.3 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 14 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-07-19 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.28 x 5.64 x 0.18 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.97 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Cyber shade |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2488 x 2224 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 417 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.88 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 is better than nubia Red Magic 3S, having a overall score of 84.3 against 75.8. Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4's construction is a lot newer and much thinner than nubia Red Magic 3S's, although it's a little heavier. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has the older 14 version while nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 features a lot better looking display than nubia Red Magic 3S, because it has a just a little higher display density, a much better resolution of 2224 x 2488 and a larger screen. The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with as much memory capacity for games and applications as the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, both have exactly the same internal storage capacity.
The nubia Red Magic 3S features a much powerful CPU than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4. They have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount. Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 counts with a little better battery duration than nubia Red Magic 3S, because it has a 2 percent bigger battery capacity. Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 shoots a bit better photographs and videos than nubia Red Magic 3S, and although they both have a same size aperture and the same video resolution, the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 also has a much bigger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a more mega pixels back-facing camera and faster video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.