Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.3 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-07-19 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.28 x 5.64 x 0.18 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.97 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2488 x 2224 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 417 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 is a little bit better than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, with a 90.7 score against 84.3. The Samsung Galaxy A52 body is somewhat lighter than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, but it is a lot thicker and was released many years before. The Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a much faster processor than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 counts with a much better display than Galaxy A52, because it has a bit better display pixel density, a bigger display and a way better resolution of 2224 x 2488 pixels. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has just a bit better camera than Galaxy A52, because although it has a camera with lot less MP resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture to take better low light captures and video, a way better video quality and a bigger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The Galaxy A52 has a bigger storage for applications and games than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 counts with a bit better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A52, because it has a 13% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.