Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.3 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-07-19 | 2018-11-15 |
| 6.28 x 5.64 x 0.18 inches | 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.97 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Metal |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2488 x 2224 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 417 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.54 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Battery | 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.88 | 5.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) is just a bit better than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, getting an 85.2 score against 84.3. Even though the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) is incredibly older and a lot thicker than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, it's design is still lighter. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 counts with a way better display than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a just a little greater pixel amount in each inch in the display, a much better 2224 x 2488px resolution and a larger screen.
Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) has slightly more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy A9 (2018) counts with a way better performance than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 processing cores.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 takes much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), and although they both have the same aperture, the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 also has a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition, a way bigger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a much better 50 mega pixels resolution camera.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 counts with better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a 5100mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.