Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.3 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| 2024-07-19 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.28 x 5.64 x 0.18 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.97 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2488 x 2224 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 417 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.54 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.88 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy F62 is slightly better than the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, having an 88.1 score against 84.3. Both devices we compare here include Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy F62 has an older 11 version while Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has Android 14. The Samsung Galaxy F62 is a notably older and thicker cellphone than the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, but Samsung was able to make it just a bit lighter anyway.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 counts with a brighter screen than Galaxy F62, because it has a bigger screen, a just a bit more pixels per inch of display, a lot higher resolution of 2224 x 2488 pixels and way more brightness. Galaxy F62 has a much greater processing power than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, although it has 6 GB lesser RAM and a lower number of cores.
Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a quite bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1 TB. Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 features a little bit better camera than Galaxy F62, because although it has a back camera with way less mega-pixels, it also counts with a larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a much better video quality and a larger aperture.
Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a superior battery duration than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, because it has a 7000mAh battery capacity against 5100mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.