Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.3 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2024-07-19 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.28 x 5.64 x 0.18 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.97 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2488 x 2224 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 417 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is much better than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, getting a overall score of 98.9 against 84.3. Both of these devices work with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has the older 13 version while Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has Android 14. Even though the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is incredibly older and way thicker than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, it's body is still a bit lighter.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a much more powerful processing unit than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4. Both of them have the same number of cores and a 12 GB RAM memory. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 counts with a sharper display than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because although it has a quite worse count of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 2224 x 2488 and a larger screen.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra takes just a bit better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for low-light images and video, and they both have the same 7680x4320 video quality and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also counts with a camera with a much better 108 MP resolution and a bigger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a greater storage to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows up to 1000 GB. Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has a bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has a 13 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.