Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 84.3 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2024-07-19 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.28 x 5.64 x 0.18 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.97 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2488 x 2224 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 417 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 10 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 6.88 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has an overall score of 84.3, which is a little bit better than Galaxy Note 3's overall score of 81.2. Both of these phones have Android OS, but Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has a more recent 14 version while Galaxy Note 3 has Android 5.0, providing the user a couple nice extra features. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 design is way newer and notably thinner than Galaxy Note 3's, although it is also noticeably heavier.
Galaxy Note 3 has a lot better processing power than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, because although it has 9 GB lesser RAM memory and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a graphics processor. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 counts with a much better screen than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a quite better pixel amount per inch in the screen, a much larger screen and a lot higher resolution of 2224 x 2488px.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 counts with a very superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage. Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 takes way better pictures and videos than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a way bigger aperture to capture better low light photos and videos, a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition, a back facing camera with a much better resolution and a lot bigger sensor taking lot higher quality photographs and videos.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 counts with a superior battery performance than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 5100mAh battery size against 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.