Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.3 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2024-07-19 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.28 x 5.64 x 0.18 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.97 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2488 x 2224 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 417 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has an overall score of 98, which is much better than the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4's overall score of 84.3. Even though Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is noticeably older and incredibly thicker than the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, it's design is still a little lighter. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has the older 13 version while Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has Android 14.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 features a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, because although it has a little bit lower count of pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a bigger screen and a slightly better 2224 x 2488 resolution. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a way better performance than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4. They have a 12 GB RAM memory and 8 CPU cores.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a quite bigger storage to install games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 counts with just a bit better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, because it has a 2 percent greater battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a bit better camera than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for taking images and video in low-light situations and a way tinier back-facing camera sensor capturing way lower quality videos and images, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 7680x4320 video definition, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also counts with a camera with way more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.