Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.3 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2024-07-19 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.28 x 5.64 x 0.18 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.97 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2488 x 2224 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 417 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 10 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 is much better than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, getting a 93.4 score against 84.3. Both devices we compare here work with Android operating system, but Galaxy S22 has older 13 version while Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has Android 14. The Galaxy S22 design is notably lighter than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, although it is thicker and was released 2 years before.
Galaxy S22 has a lot better processing power than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, although it has 4 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 features just a bit better display than Galaxy S22, because although it has a quite inferior pixel count per screen inch, it also counts with a really larger display, a lot brighter screen and a lot higher resolution of 2224 x 2488.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has a much greater memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy S22, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 counts with a much longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S22, because it has a 5100mAh battery capacity instead of 3700mAh.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 counts with just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy S22, and although they both have a 50 mega pixels camera in the back, the same video quality and the same 24 fps video frame rates, the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 also has a larger aperture and a bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a higher image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.