Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.3 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2024-07-19 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.28 x 5.64 x 0.18 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.97 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2488 x 2224 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 417 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is better than the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, getting a overall score of 95.4 against 84.3. Both phones we compare here have Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has the previous 13 version while Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has Android 14. Despite being the best in this comparison, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra design is much older, a little bit heavier and thicker than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra features a way better performance than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has just a bit better looking display than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has a just a little worse pixels density, it also counts with a lot brighter screen, a slightly higher 2224 x 2488 resolution and a larger display.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has a superior storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has 256 GB internal memory. Galaxy S22 Ultra takes a bit better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for low light photography and videos, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same video definition, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also counts with a back camera with way more MP and a larger back-facing camera sensor.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 counts with a bit superior battery performance than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has 5100mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.