Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.3 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 14 |
| 2024-07-19 | -- |
| 6.28 x 5.64 x 0.18 inches | -- |
| 7.97 ounces | -- |
| Black, Blue and White | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2488 x 2224 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 417 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 6.21 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a general score of 90.7, which is a bit better than the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4's general score of 84.3. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra's design is lighter and noticeably thinner than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4. Both phones in this comparison include the same Android 14 operating system.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra's CPU is just as good as the CPU in Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, both of them have 12 GB of RAM memory and 8 processing cores. The Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a little more vivid display than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, because although it has less brightness, a little bit worse resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher display density.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features a superior camera than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, and although they both have a same size aperture and the same video quality, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra also has higher 30 frames per second video frame rate, a much more mega-pixels camera and a larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra and Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 both have incredibly similar memory to install games and applications, both of them have the same internal memory capacity. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy S25 Ultra, because it has a 5100mAh battery capacity against 5000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.