Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.3 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 5.0 |
| 2024-07-19 | -- |
| 6.28 x 5.64 x 0.18 inches | 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.97 ounces | -- |
| Black, Blue and White | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2488 x 2224 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 417 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 10 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 6.21 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.54 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.88 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 is a little bit better than Galaxy S6 Active, having an 84.3 score against 80.9. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has 14 version while Galaxy S6 Active has Android 5.0 version, providing you lots of additional features and performance tweaks.
Galaxy S6 Active has a very superior processing unit than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, and they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy S6 Active also counts with a 64-bit processing unit and an additional GPU. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 counts with a little sharper screen than Galaxy S6 Active, because although it has a much lower display pixels density, it also counts with a really bigger display and a better 2224 x 2488 resolution.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 features a lot bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy S6 Active, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal storage. Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 takes a lot better videos and photos than Galaxy S6 Active, because it has a lot better resolution back-facing camera, a much higher video quality, a way bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a bigger camera aperture to capture better low-light photos and video.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 counts with a much better battery life than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, because it has a 46 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.