Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.3 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-07-19 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.28 x 5.64 x 0.18 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.97 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2488 x 2224 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 417 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 is much better than Galaxy S7 Active, getting a global score of 84.3 against 75.8. Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 is a a lot newer and way thinner phone than Galaxy S7 Active, although it's heavier. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 counts with a little more vivid screen than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a lot lesser pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with way more brightness, a better 2224 x 2488 resolution and a lot larger screen.
Galaxy S7 Active features a lot better processing power than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and a lower number of cores. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 counts with a way bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 counts with superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 5100mAh battery size against 4000mAh. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 shoots much better photographs and videos than Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 also has a way higher video resolution and a much more MP camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.