Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.3 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2024-07-19 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.28 x 5.64 x 0.18 inches | 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.97 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 336.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2488 x 2224 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 417 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 is a bit better than Galaxy S7 edge, getting a score of 84.3 against 78.1. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 construction is way newer and noticeably thinner than the Galaxy S7 edge's, but it is also noticeably heavier. Both phones we compare here come with Android operating system, but Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has the previous 14 version while Galaxy S7 edge has Android 8.0 Oreo.
Galaxy S7 edge has a much more powerful processor than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and 4 less processing cores (although faster). The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 features a better looking display than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has a little bit inferior count of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2224 x 2488 and a way larger display.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 takes much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy S7 edge, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 also has a much larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a back facing camera with a much higher 50 MP resolution.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 features a very superior storage for games and applications than Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has a way better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because it has a 42 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.