Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.3 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2024-07-19 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.28 x 5.64 x 0.18 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 7.97 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2488 x 2224 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | -- |
| 417 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.54 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has a general score of 84.3, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro's 80.1 general score. Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4's construction is notably newer, notably thinner and somewhat lighter than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has the older 14 version and Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 features a much better looking display than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a way worse display density, it also counts with a higher 2224 x 2488 pixels resolution and a lot bigger screen. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with an extremely better CPU than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, although it has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 counts with more memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has a very superior camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low-light images and video, it also counts with a much higher 7680x4320 video definition, a camera with a much better resolution and a much bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has just a bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a 13 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.