Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.3 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-07-19 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.28 x 5.64 x 0.18 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.97 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2488 x 2224 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 417 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.88 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has an overall score of 84.3, which is a little bit better than Galaxy XCover Pro's global score of 81. Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 is a much newer and thinner phone than Galaxy XCover Pro, although it is a bit heavier. Both of these devices work with Android OS, but the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has the newer 14 version and Galaxy XCover Pro has Android 11, offering some nice extra features.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has a much more vibrant screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a little bit more pixels per inch of display, a lot higher 2224 x 2488px resolution and a bigger screen. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has more memory for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with an extremely better CPU than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, although it has 8 GB lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 counts with a much better camera than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a F1.7 aperture, the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 also has a way higher video resolution, a lot larger sensor and a way more MP camera in the back.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has longer battery life than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 26% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.