Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.3 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2024-07-19 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.28 x 5.64 x 0.18 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.97 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2488 x 2224 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 417 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip has a score of 88.5, which is just a bit better than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4's overall score of 84.3. The Galaxy Z Flip design is lighter than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, although it's much thicker and was released 5 years before. Both phones in this comparison review include Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Z Flip has an older 12 version while Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has Android 14 version.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a much powerful processor than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, although it has less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 features a lot better looking display than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a bit inferior pixels count per inch of display, it also counts with a larger screen and a better resolution of 2224 x 2488 pixels.
Galaxy Z Flip counts with as much storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos as the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, both have equal 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 shoots much better photographs and videos than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a lot better video quality, a larger aperture to take better low light photos and videos, a way bigger back-facing camera sensor which gives a way better image and video quality and a much more megapixels back camera.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 counts with a superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 5100mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.