Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.3 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| 2024-07-19 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.28 x 5.64 x 0.18 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 7.97 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2488 x 2224 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 417 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.54 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a score of 90.6, which is just a bit better than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4's 84.3 general score. Despite being the best device in our current comparison, we must note that it is also a much older, noticeably thicker and heavier device. Both devices in this comparison work with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has older 11 version and Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has Android 14.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has a much sharper screen than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a better 2224 x 2488 resolution, a bit larger screen and a little greater count of pixels per inch in the display. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a much greater performance than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4. Both have a Octa-Core processing unit and a 12 GB RAM.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 count with incredibly similar memory for games and applications, both have equal 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 counts with a lot better camera than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a way higher 50 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back and a much bigger camera aperture to capture better low-light images.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 counts with longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a 16 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.