Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.3 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2024-07-19 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.28 x 5.64 x 0.18 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.97 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2488 x 2224 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 417 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.88 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 is slightly better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, having a global score of 84.3 against 81.1. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has newer 14 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has Android 10 version. Even though Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 is a little heavier than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, it's way thinner and much newer.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a much better performing processor than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 counts with an incredibly better display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because it has a way higher resolution of 2224 x 2488px, a just a bit better pixel density and a bigger display.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 counts with a little bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a back facing camera with a lot lower resolution, it also counts with a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a bigger diafragm aperture and a bigger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has more storage to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal memory. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has just a bit better battery lifetime than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because it has 5100mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.