Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2021-04-16 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.82 x 5.25 x 0.30 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 11.18 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black and Ceramic | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2480 x 1860 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 388 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| 900 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 80.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold, with a global score of 80 against 79.8. The Google Pixel 3 is a way older and just a little bit thicker cellphone than the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold, but Google was able to build it incredibly lighter anyway. Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold counts with a bit more vivid display than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a little worse pixel density, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1860 x 2480 pixels and a lot larger screen.
Google Pixel 3 has a very superior processing unit than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold has a way bigger storage to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 3, because it has 192 GB more internal storage.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold features a much better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity instead of 2915mAh. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold features a little bit better camera than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold also has a camera with much more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.