Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2021-04-16 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.82 x 5.25 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 11.18 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black and Ceramic | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2480 x 1860 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 388 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 900 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 80.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 5G is much better than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold, getting a global score of 91.3 against 79.8. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A52 5G has newer 12 version and Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold has Android 10 version. The Galaxy A52 5G construction is much lighter but just a little thicker than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold, and they were only released with a couple months difference.
Galaxy A52 5G has a much greater processing power than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold counts with a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a little worse count of pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1860 x 2480 pixels and a bigger display.
Galaxy A52 5G has a quite bigger storage to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports up to 1 TB. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold counts with a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy A52 5G, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G captures better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold, although it has a back facing camera with much less mega pixels resolution, they both have the same aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.