Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2021-04-16 | -- |
| 6.82 x 5.25 x 0.30 inches | -- |
| 11.18 ounces | -- |
| Black and Ceramic | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2480 x 1860 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 388 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| 900 cd/m2 brightness | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 6.21 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 80.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 Ultra has an overall score of 90.7, which is better than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold's 79.8 score. Galaxy S25 Ultra is a notably lighter and noticeably thinner phone than the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android operating system, but the Galaxy S25 Ultra has newer 14 version while Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold has Android 10 version, giving you some additional features and performance tweaks.
Galaxy S25 Ultra's processing unit is very similar to the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold one, they have a Octa-Core CPU and the same RAM amount. Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a more vivid display than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a little bit worse resolution of 1440 x 3088, it also counts with way more brightness and a greater pixels amount per inch of display.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra and Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold have very similar storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos, both have exactly the same internal storage capacity. The Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a very superior camera than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold, because it has a camera with a lot higher resolution and a larger aperture.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra's battery duration is just as good as the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold one, although the Galaxy S25 Ultra has a 0 percent lower battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.