Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2021-04-16 | 2018-03-16 |
| 6.82 x 5.25 x 0.30 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 11.18 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black and Ceramic | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2480 x 1860 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 388 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| 900 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 80.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S9 has a general score of 83.3, which is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold's global score of 79.8. Although Samsung Galaxy S9 is way older and just a little thicker than the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold, it's design is still noticeably lighter. Galaxy S9 features a very superior CPU than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Galaxy S9 has just a bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold, because although it has a lot smaller display and a quite lower 1440 x 2960 resolution, it also counts with a higher screen pixel density. Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold takes clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S9, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for shooting pictures in low light environments, it also counts with a back facing camera with lot more MP.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold counts with a better storage for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S9, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal memory. Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold features a much longer battery duration than Galaxy S9, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.