Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-04-16 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.82 x 5.25 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 11.18 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black and Ceramic | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2480 x 1860 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 388 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 900 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 80.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a general score of 81, which is a little bit better than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold's 79.8 score. Both phones we compare here use Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a newer 11 version while Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold has Android 10, so it provides some nice extra features and some performance improvements. Even though Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is older and thicker than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold, it's construction is still extremely lighter.
Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a much better performing processor than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold counts with a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a little less pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1860 x 2480 pixels and a larger display.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold takes slightly better pictures and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for capturing pictures or videos in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a way higher 108 megapixels resolution camera. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold counts with a bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold has longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity instead of 4050mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.