Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-04-16 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.82 x 5.25 x 0.30 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 11.18 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and Ceramic | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2480 x 1860 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 388 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 900 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 80.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has an overall score of 88.5, which is much better than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold's overall score of 79.8. Even though Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is older than the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold, it's construction is a lot lighter and a bit thinner. Both devices we are comparing have Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a newer 12 version and Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold has Android 10, providing the user some extra features and better performance.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold features a bit better screen than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a just a bit worse display density, it also counts with a larger display and a better resolution of 1860 x 2480. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip and Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold feature extremely similar storage capacity for applications and games, both have exactly the same 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a much more powerful CPU than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold counts with a superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 52% larger battery size. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold has just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold also has a much more mega-pixels back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.