Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-11-04 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.25 x 3.22 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black and White | Silver and Space gray |
| Ceramic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 590.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2040 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 361 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2340 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone X is much better than the Xiaomi Mi MIX, having a global score of 88.1 against 76.2. The iPhone X construction is newer, somewhat lighter and just a little thinner than the Xiaomi Mi MIX. IPhone X has a bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Mi MIX, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per screen inch, a little brighter screen and a bit higher resolution of 1125 x 2436 pixels.
The Apple iPhone X features a superior performance than Xiaomi Mi MIX, because although it has 1 GB lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a larger number of faster cores and a 64-bits processing unit. Apple iPhone X captures clearer videos and photos than Xiaomi Mi MIX, because although it has a way worse 12 MP resolution camera in the back and a worse (4K) video definition, it also counts with a bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a bigger aperture to capture better low light photos and videos.
The Apple iPhone X has a much better storage for apps and games than Xiaomi Mi MIX, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Mi MIX features a very superior battery lifetime than iPhone X, because it has a 62 percent bigger battery capacity.
Apple iPhone X is way more expensive than the Xiaomi Mi MIX, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.