Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-11-04 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.25 x 3.22 x 0.31 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Black and White | Cyber shade |
| Ceramic | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 590.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2040 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 361 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2340 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi MIX is a bit better than the nubia Red Magic 3S, getting a 76.2 score against 75.8. Both phones in this review include Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Mi MIX has an older 6.0 Marshmallow version while nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie. Despite of the fact that the Xiaomi Mi MIX is incredibly older than nubia Red Magic 3S, it's design is somewhat thinner and a little lighter.
The Xiaomi Mi MIX counts with a bit sharper display than nubia Red Magic 3S, although it has a little smaller display, a little lower count of pixels per inch of display and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2040. Nubia Red Magic 3S features a little faster CPU than Xiaomi Mi MIX, because it has a greater amount of RAM and more cpu cores.
Nubia Red Magic 3S shoots way better photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi MIX, because it has a bigger diafragm aperture for better low-light photography and videos, a much larger camera sensor, a much higher 7680x4320 video definition and a way more mega-pixels camera in the back. Nubia Red Magic 3S has a way bigger storage to install games and applications than Xiaomi Mi MIX, because it has 256 GB internal storage.
Nubia Red Magic 3S has just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi MIX, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4400mAh.
Xiaomi Mi MIX not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also cheaper than the nubia Red Magic 3S.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.