Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.6 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-09 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.21 x 2.92 x 0.38 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.20 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Glacier white, Midnight black and Nebula purple | Black, Pink and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 377.00 | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5260mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 XL has an overall score of 80.7, which is a little bit better than Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite's score of 80.6. Despite of the fact that the Google Pixel 3 XL is older than the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite, it's body is somewhat thinner and just a little lighter. The Google Pixel 3 XL has a bit faster processing unit than Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite, although it has less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Google Pixel 3 XL features a slightly better screen than Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixels quantity per inch of display and a higher 1440 x 2960px resolution. The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite and the Google Pixel 3 XL both feature extremely similar memory capacity for applications and games, both have equal 64 GB internal storage capacity.
The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite takes way better videos and photos than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite also counts with a lot bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a back camera with way more megapixels.
The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite features a much better battery duration than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a 5260mAh battery capacity against 3430mAh.
Despite of being the best phone in our comparison, the Google Pixel 3 XL is also very cheap compared to the other ones, making this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.