Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.6 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-05-09 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.21 x 2.92 x 0.38 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.20 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Glacier white, Midnight black and Nebula purple | Black, Purple and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 377.00 | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5260mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.96 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite is a little bit better than Google Pixel 3a XL, getting a score of 80.6 against 78.9. Both phones in this comparison review use the same Android 11 OS (Operating System). Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite's design is newer, but somewhat thicker and heavier than the Google Pixel 3a XL.
The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite has just a bit better performance than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite also has a greater amount of RAM. The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite counts with a slightly better display than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a just a bit worse count of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a little bit bigger screen and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2340px.
The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite and the Google Pixel 3a XL have similar storage for applications and games, both have the same internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite has a much better camera than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low light photography and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite also counts with a way bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a lot better image quality and a way more megapixels camera in the back.
The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite counts with a much better battery performance than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has 5260mAh of battery capacity.
Although Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Google Pixel 3a XL, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Google Pixel 3a XL. If you prefer to save some money, you can get Google Pixel 3a XL, and give up a few features and specs, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.