Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.6 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | HTC |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-09 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.21 x 2.92 x 0.38 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.20 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Glacier white, Midnight black and Nebula purple | 16 777 216 |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 377.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 396 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5260mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite is a little bit better than the HTC U Ultra, getting a global score of 80.6 against 77. The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite construction is noticeably newer than HTC U Ultra's, although it is somewhat thicker and heavier. The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite has a bit more vivid display than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a bit lower pixels quantity in each inch of display and a bit lower 1080 x 2340px resolution, it also counts with a little bit bigger screen.
HTC U Ultra features a way bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite, and although they both have equal internal storage, the HTC U Ultra also has a SD extension slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite features a bit more powerful processor than HTC U Ultra, because it has more RAM memory and a larger number of cores.
The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite features a way better battery life than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 75 percent more battery size. The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite counts with a greater camera than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for capturing pictures in low-light situations, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite also counts with a camera with way more megapixels and a much bigger sensor.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite is also very cheap compared to the other ones, making this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.