Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.6 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | HTC |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-09 | 2017-05-18 |
| 6.21 x 2.92 x 0.38 inches | 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.20 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Glacier white, Midnight black and Nebula purple | Black, Blue, Silver and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 377.00 | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 396 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5260mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite is slightly better than HTC U11, having an 80.6 score against 77.6. Even though Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite is much newer than HTC U11, it's thicker and heavier. The HTC U11 counts with a bit more vivid screen than Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a greater display pixels density.
HTC U11 has a lot bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the HTC U11 also has an external memory card slot that admits up to 128 GB. The HTC U11 counts with just a little better hardware performance than Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 cores.
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite captures way better photographs and videos than HTC U11, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for taking photographs and/or video in low-light situations, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite also counts with a much larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a much more mega pixels back facing camera.
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite counts with a much better battery lifetime than HTC U11, because it has a 75% bigger battery capacity.
Although Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite is a better device, it costs more than HTC U11, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as HTC U11. If you want to save some dollars, you can buy the HTC U11, and give up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.