Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.6 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-05-09 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.21 x 2.92 x 0.38 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.20 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Glacier white, Midnight black and Nebula purple | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 377.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5260mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite is a little bit better than the Motorola Moto Z Force, having a global score of 80.6 against 75.8. These phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite has 11 version while Motorola Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat version. The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite construction is notably newer, but much thicker and much heavier than the Motorola Moto Z Force.
Moto Z Force and Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite both have quite similar displays, because although the Moto Z Force has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixel density and a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution. The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite features just a little better performance than Moto Z Force, because it has more 2.2 gigahertz CPU cores and 2 GB more RAM memory.
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite captures way better videos and photos than Moto Z Force, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite also counts with a lot more MP camera in the back. The Motorola Moto Z Force has a much better storage for apps and games than Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Motorola Moto Z Force also has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB.
The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite features a very superior battery lifetime than Moto Z Force, because it has a 50 percent bigger battery capacity.
Although Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Moto Z Force, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Moto Z Force. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get Moto Z Force, giving up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.