Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.6 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-09 | 2017-06-29 |
| 6.21 x 2.92 x 0.38 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 7.20 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Glacier white, Midnight black and Nebula purple | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 377.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5260mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite is just a bit better than the Moto Z2 Play, getting a overall score of 80.6 against 77.4. The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite design is newer, but heavier and a lot thicker than the Moto Z2 Play. Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite has a little better performance than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite has just a bit better screen than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a just a bit lower screen density, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a larger display. The Moto Z2 Play has a superior storage for apps and games than Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Moto Z2 Play also has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite features a way better camera than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for low-light photography and videos, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite also counts with a way more megapixels camera.
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite has a way better battery lifetime than Moto Z2 Play, because it has 5260mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Although Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola Moto Z2 Play. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite, but if you don't you can save some dollars and buy the Motorola Moto Z2 Play, letting go some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.